Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Protest Poster



Artist Statement: Many Americans have a skewed view of the government’s role in the economy.  The only two people who commented on my poster were my roommate and brother, and they both agreed with me.  Here are my views.

I took a course on the culture and history of Spanish America.  It was fascinating to me to learn about a number of different countries that all seemed to cycle through the same history.  Almost every country has implemented either in the past or at the present time, socialistic or communistic policies in government and finances.  Those policies have failed time and time again.  Even in Cuba during the dictatorship of Fidel Castro, who was very particular in remaining a Marxist, was reduced to bringing capitalism back in for short periods of time to bring money back into their economy.  In spite of this clear pattern, we are heading down the path to repeat history yet again.

Evita Perón was born into a lower class and rose to an upper class though her marriage to socialist Juan Perón, who became the president of Argentina.  Evita did many good and great things for the lower class and women’s suffrage, and some of those actions have had lasting effects.  Many of the free things she gave to the lower class and institutions she started failed because they were taking money from the upper class to fund them and, contrary to common belief, the upper class does not have an unlimited supply of funds. 

In a youtube video, Lies, Propagand and the Election of 2012 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lzol3Vx2Io), the narrator makes a valid point:  Since when is it the government’s job to provide jobs?

In Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, he refers to “the invisible hand”, that is the relationship between consumer and producer, that would for the most part ensure that the economy is stable.  He did mention that there would be times for the government to step in and protect against unfair business dealings, but those government actions were supposed to be the exception, not the norm.

Our current president has promised to provide many things, essentially “free”.  In the president’s very own American Jobs Act, it states:

5. FULLY PAID FOR AS PART OF THE PRESIDENT’S LONG-TERM DEFICIT REDUCTION PLAN.
To ensure that the American Jobs Act is fully paid for, the President will call on the Joint Committee to come up with additional deficit reduction necessary to pay for the Act and still meet its deficit target. The President will, in the coming days, release a detailed plan that will show how we can do that while achieving the additional deficit reduction necessary to meet the President’s broader goal of stabilizing our debt as a share of the economy.”

When have I heard that story before?   People don’t like losing funding, yet the money needs to come from somewhere.  Do I smell a fire burning though America’s wallet?

Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad, Poor Dad made an important observation.  The public school system does a good job of creating good employees.  It does not do a good job of creating good bosses or teaching how to create wealth and creating profitable circumstances instead of being dependent to the financial environment.  If the government does have a responsibility in the workforce, it is teaching us how to become financially indipendant.

I am surprised when I talk to people about wanting to obtain sources of residual or passive income and I get asked, “What is that?”  We have some work to do.

In the TED talk that we viewed, Chimamanda Adichie said, “The problem with stereotypes is not that they are untrue, they are incomplete.  A single story creates stereotypes.”  I am sharing a single story.  Maybe if I were impoverished I would be telling the evils of capitalism.

Is capitalism a perfect system?  Of course not.  It is the system that promotes the most individual growth, freedom of choice and possibility to those who are willing and able to learn the system we live in.

No comments:

Post a Comment